The purpose of this article is to explain the entire process of mediation in Bangladesh: provisions that regulate mediation, step by step procedure, mediation agreement, costs, timeline etc.

What is ADR or Mediation in Bangladesh?

 Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) is an  alternative route to a quicker and cheaper method of settling disputes in which a neutral third party helps the disputing parties reach a resolution.  Mediation is one of the major forms of ADR, the other two being arbitration and conciliation.  Section 89A  of Code of Civil Procedure is the main provision of mediation in Bangladesh. 

Mediation in Bangladesh is a procedure in which the conflicting parties  attempt, with the assistance of a neutral third party (the Mediator), to reach a settlement of their disputed issues through negotiation.

 When a consensus is reached, the parties may call upon the services of the Mediator or one of their lawyers to draft a document that they will sign in order to record and finalize the consensus.  This official document will be known as their settlement agreement, which will binding on the parties.

Benefits of Mediation in Bangladesh

As mentioned above, medication is less expensive and more quicker than going to the court which allows the parties to move on from the issue more swiftly. Mediation enables you to retain control. In mediation, unlike in court where a judge makes the decisions, you select how to settle the disagreement and are not required to accept a conclusion with which you are unsatisfied.

Mediation offers  an encouraging and private environment.  The mediator will listen to all perspectives, speaking with the parties individually and when necessary, with all the opposing parties in the same room.

Mediation can aid in the preservation of relationships. A dispute that is resolved by an antagonistic court battle can strain the relationship between the parties.  However, mediation helps you focus on effective communication in order to create solutions that work for everyone. Hence, mediation in Bangladesh are especially encouraged for disputes in partnership, family law, property neighbours, businesses, etc.

Another instrumental benefit of mediation in Bangladesh is confidentiality. Since mediation is an attempt to resolve their disputes through facilitated negotiation, all discussions between the parties (whether with one another or privately with the mediator) will be “without prejudice.” “Without prejudice” means that any information resulting from mediation sessions must be viewed as both confidential and non-binding by all parties. Non-compellable indicates that neither party will raise such material in any legal procedure. Consequently, neither party may request or require the mediator to furnish information, give testimony, or produce documents in any legal case regarding the substance of any of the mediation sessions. The entire mediation process will be absolutely confidential. 

Step by Step Procedure of Mediation

Appointment of a Mediator:

  The first step in commencing mediation in Bangladesh is to appoint a mediator, which will be determined by both parties. Mediator’s goal is to assist the parties in obtaining their own most constructive and equitable agreement. The Mediator has an obligation to work equally on behalf of each party, cannot provide individual legal advice to any party, and will not engage in therapy during the mediation. The respective clients and mediator will negotiate and define the fees and procedure to be followed in order to reach a settlement through mediation.  

Costs of Mediation:

Consequently, the cost of hiring the mediator will be covered by both parties.

Mediation Sessions:

It is understood that most mediation sessions will involve both parties in joint sessions with the Mediator, but separate meetings may be held between the Mediator and the parties individually before and during the mediation. If the Mediator requests a separate meeting with one party during a mediation session, he or she will also have a separate meeting with the other party.

Time Frame:

If the court itself refers mediation to the parties, then  under section 89A, sub-section (1), the parties shall inform the Court in writing of the mediator they have appointed within ten days from the date of reference. If the parties fail to appoint a mediator during this period, the Court shall, within seven days, appoint a mediator and the mediation under this section shall be concluded within sixty (60) days from the day the Court is so informed unless the Court of its own motion or upon a joint request of the parties, extends the time for a further period of 30  days.

In the case on non-court referred mediation in Bangladesh, if the parties have not already fixed the duration of mediation process in their mediation agreement, the parties themselves can determine the time frame within which they desire to conclude the mediation. The suggested timeline may range from 30 days to 90 days, depending on the complications of the issue at hand. 

Settlement Agreement or Court Decree

When a consensus is established, the parties may request the Mediator’s or one of their attorneys’ assistance in drafting a document that both the parties and mediator will sign to record and finalize the agreement. This official document will be known as the parties’ settlement agreement and will be legally binding.

In the case of court referred mediation in Bangladesh, the Legal Aid Officer or mediator will submit to the court a report of the result of the mediation proceedings, and if the result is a compromise of the  disputes in the suit, the terms of such compromise shall be reduced to writing in the form of an agreement, bearing signatures or left thumb impressions of the parties as executants, and signatures of the Legal Aid Officer or mediator. Court will pass an order or a decree in accordance with relevant provisions of Order XXIII of the Code of Civil Procedure within seven days from receiving the said report.

Here is a table that outlines the general step-by-step procedure for mediation in Bangladesh:

I hope this table is helpful! Please note that this is a general outline and the specific steps and procedures may vary depending on the circumstances of the case and the preferences of the parties and the mediator. Let us know if you have any questions or need more information.

Here is a table with ten frequently asked questions about mediation in Bangladesh:

Are you planning to do arbitration or  looking for alternative dispute resolution remedies in Bangladesh?

Tahmidur Rahman Remura Wahid TRW is a full-service law firm that has been dealing with arbitration consisting of a wide range of topics at both international and local level. We have barristers that have specialised in  international commercial arbitration from the United Kingdom and accredited civil-commercial mediators. 

If you require any assistance or consultation, please visit our office or contact us at +8801779127165 or +8801847220062 (WhatsApp) or by email- info@trfirm.com. 

E-mail: info@trfirm.com
Phone: +8801847220062 or +8801779127165 or +8801708080817

Address: House 410, Road 29, Mohakhali DOHS, Dhaka 1206

The purpose of this article is to provide an in-depth overview of joint ventures (JV) in Bangldesh: types of JV, formation of JV, what to look for in a joint venture partner, and JV agreements.

What are Joint Ventures?

A joint venture or JV comprises two or more businesses or corporations linking their resources and knowledge to accomplish a specific objective. The venture’s risks and rewards are also shared. A JV may be confined to a single project and so time-bound, or it may be an agreement to conduct a certain type of business as a continuing operation and thus not time-bound. In the case of a time-bound contract, the venture concludes upon completion of the underlying project.

Among the motives for forming a joint venture are corporate expansion, the creation of new products, and entry into new markets, — in particular internationally.

Your company may have a high growth potential and unique concepts, and products, but  a joint venture could expedite the process and provide:

• enhanced competence,
• additional resources,
• better technical prowess
• easier access to established marketplaces and distribution channels

Formation of Joint Ventures

A joint venture can be established using any of the following options:

A foreign corporation enters a new market by acquiring a stake in a local company; conversely, if a local company desires to expand its operations into new avenues, it can acquire a stake in an already-established foreign company.
 The co-venturers may, however, form a brand-new corporation for each new commercial venture.
Occasionally, the government may also enter into joint ventures with corporate companies for their expertise.

Types of Joint Venture

There are various types of joint ventures. How you form a joint venture will depend on the objectives of your firm.

1. Project Partnership

The most common type of joint venture. It might be used to construct a toll road or an office building, among other things. The purpose is defined and confined to the completion of a particular project in accordance with the agreement of the venture. After the completion of the project, the Joint Venture comes to an end.

2. Limited Co-operation

This is when you agree to a limited and particular collaboration with another business. For instance, a small business with an innovative new product may choose to sell it through the distribution network of a larger corporation. The two partners agree to a contract outlining the rules and conditions of their arrangement.

3. Separate Joint Venture Business

Alternately, you may wish to establish a distinct joint venture, or even a new corporation, to handle a specific contract. This type of joint venture corporation might be a highly adaptable alternative. Each partner owns a share of the company and agrees on its management.

4. Business Partnerships

In some instances, a limited liability company may not be the best option. You could instead establish a company partnership or a limited liability partnership. You could even combine the two companies.
In certain situations, other options may be preferable to forming a corporation. You could, for instance, form a commercial partnership. You may even decide to merge your two enterprises totally.

5.  Functional Joint Venture
Each company has specialization in one or more business functions; consequently, they desire to establish a symbiotic environment for each other and reap the benefits of the synergies that result.

6. Vertical Joint Venture

As like  a vertical merger and acquisition, the joint venture consists of two businesses inside the same supply chain. This is done when one of the entities produces a specialized good for which it requires a specialized raw material. To this end, it can invest with the supplier to create and maintain the capacity for such manufacturing, thereby mitigating the risk associated with the unavailability of this raw material. This occurs when the production business wishes to preserve a certain level of secrecy or when the demand for the input is low but the demand for the end product is great. A real-world example would be a certain type of computer chip used in the manufacture of certain patented technological objects.

7. Horizontal Joint Venture

Similarly, this type of joint venture involves two businesses that produce identical goods or services. This enables one of the enterprises to enter a new market, such as a new geographical region. The local partner possesses country-specific knowledge and information, such as an established distribution network, whilst the foreign partner can benefit from economies of scale.

 Which type of JV fits your objectives?

To determine which sort of joint venture is optimal for you, you should assess your involvement in its management. You should also consider what might occur if the venture fails and how much risk you are willing to take.

It is essential to seek legal counsel to determine your best course of action. The manner in which a joint venture is established impacts its management, profit distribution, and taxation. It also impacts your obligation should the venture fail. You need a legally binding contract that specifies how the joint venture will operate and how any profits will be divided. Refer to the section of this article detailing how to create a joint venture agreement.

          Joint Venture Agreement (JVA) 

When forming a joint venture, the terms and conditions should be outlined in a joint venture agreement. This will aid in avoiding ambiguities once the joint venture is operational.

A JVA should address:

• the objectives of the joint venture
• the financial contributions you will each make
• whether you will transfer any assets or employees to the joint venture ownership of intellectual property created by the joint venture
• management and control, e.g. respective responsibilities and
• processes to be followed how liabilities, profits and losses are shared how any disputes between the parties will be resolve.
• You may also require additional agreements, such as a confidentiality agreement, to safeguard any trade secrets you divulge.

Before making any final decisions, it is crucial to obtain professional advice from barristers or lawyers who may draw up your joint venture agreement. 

              Choosing a Suitable Co-Venturer

The ideal partner in a joint venture is one with complementary resources, skills, and assets. The joint venture must be viable contractually, and the values of the two organizations must be compatible.

Assessing the compatibility of existing clients and suppliers with whom you have an established, long-term connection is a solid beginning point. You may also consider your competition and other professional colleagues. In general, you must consider the following:

• What is their performance?
• How do they view collaboration, and do they share your level of dedication?
• Are your business objectives the same?
• Can you rely on them?
• Do their brand principles align with your own?
• What is the nature of their reputation?

If you decide to evaluate a new potential partner, you must conduct the following checks:

• Are they secure financially?
• Do they experience credit issues?
• Do they have existing joint venture ties with other companies?
• What type of management team do they possess?
• How are their production, marketing, and people operations?
• What do their clients and suppliers have to say about their reliability and reputation?

Before entering into a joint venture, it is essential to safeguard your personal interests. This should entail drafting legal documentation to protect your own trade secrets and determining if your possible business partner has intellectual property rights agreements.

Are you planning to do a writ or looking for criminal and civil remedies in Bangladesh?

Tahmidur Rahman Remura Wahid TRW is a full-service law firm that has been dealing with Writ-related problems on a regular basis since its inception through its qualified and experienced lawyers.

If you require any assistance or consultation, please visit our office or contact us at +8801779127165 or +8801847220062 (WhatsApp) or by email- info@trfirm.com.

E-mail: info@trfirm.com
Phone: +8801847220062 or +8801779127165 or +8801708080817

Address: House 410, Road 29, Mohakhali DOHS, Dhaka 1206

The purpose of this article is to clarify writs in Bangladesh:  the five types of writs, the court process and jurisdiction, who can apply for a writ, the grounds on which a writ can be applied, and how writs are executed. 

What are Writs?

A writ is a formal, legal document drafted by courts that commands an individual or entity to conduct  or stop doing  a certain action or deed. The right to a writ is a crucial legal remedy that citizens  have when their fundamental rights have been violated, such as by an illegal act of government, a legal error, etc., in order to enforce and apply substantive law. According to Article 102 of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh Constitution, this right is exercised in Bangladesh by submitting a written petition, or writ petition, to the High Court Division of the Supreme Court, asking for the court’s recommendations or rulings on the topic.  The opposing parties, or respondents, are then summoned by the court and ordered to do or  to refrain from doing something.

There are five types of writs in Bangladesh:

• Habeas Corpus
• Certiorari
• Prohibition
• Mandamus 
• Quo-Warranto

1. Writ of Habeas Corpus

The first type of writ in Bangladesh is referred to as Habeas Corpus. Habeas Corpus is Latin for “have his body.” Since 1640, this law has protected the liberty of British subjects against their unlawful imprisonment in public or private custody. The King’s Bench issues a writ of habeas corpus to determine if an individual was unlawfully detained. In accordance with sub-clause I of clause (b) of sub-clause (2) of article 102 of the Bangladesh Constitution, the High Court Division, upon the application of any person, directs that a person in custody be brought before it so that it may determine whether he is being detained with or without legal authority. Illegally detained individuals may file a petition for the writ of habeas corpus. However, if the prisoner is unable to make such an application, any other interested party may do so on his behalf. Thus, a wife, a father, or even a friend may apply for the writ of habeas corpus in such situations.

Every request for a writ of habeas corpus must be accompanied by an affidavit detailing the facts and circumstances that led to the request. If the court determines that there is a prima facie case for granting the petition, it will issue a rule directing the detaining authority to show cause on a certain date why the ruling  should not be made absolute. The court will assess the merits of the case and issue an appropriate order on the specified date.

If the court determines that he is being unlawfully detained by the authority, it can declare that authority to be without legal jurisdiction. Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure also permits the High Court Division to issue an order in the manner of a writ of habeas corpus to summon a person imprisoned in public or private custody before it in order to determine whether he is being detained illegally or inappropriately. If the High Court Division determines that the detainee is being detained illegally or improperly, it orders the detaining authority or person to release him.

Case Law References:

• AKM Azizul Hoque Vs. Bangladesh, 42 DLR 189
  When a specific criminal accusation has been lodged and a specific criminal case is ongoing, the executive authority should not commit resources to preventative detention. The administrative authority has a solemn constitutional commitment to assist the Supreme Court.
• Habiba Mahmud Vs. Bangladesh, 45 DLR (AD) 89
  The Court must maintain a balance between the State’s duty to prevent harmful actions and the citizen’s right to personal freedom.
  Government of Bangladesh v. Sajeda Parvin, 40 DLR (AD) 178
  Important is the reality of detention, not the date of the order for detention.
• Bangladesh and Others v. Jamil Huq, 1 BLD (AD) 488
  The only thing that can be asserted is that the grounds on which a Court Martial established under the Army Act can be challenged by habeas corpus will be analogous to those available under Article 102, subsection 5, of the Constitution.

2. Writ of Certiorari

Certiorari is Latin meaning “to be certified” or “to be more completely aware of.” Initially, certiorari was a court order. With the passage of time, the scope of this writ was expanded to include judicial, quasi-judicial, and even administrative powers. This writ power enables the High Court Division of the Supreme Court to control the actions of the inferior or subordinate courts, i.e. to determine whether the subordinate courts in Bangladesh are operating within their jurisdiction or beyond it.

A writ of certiorari may be submitted by the aggrieved party or, in some circumstances, by anyone against a lower court, tribunal, or authority that abused its power or breached the principle of natural justice.

The court should give ex.debito justitiae relief if the application is made by the party directly impacted by the lawsuit. However, if the application is made by a person not directly affected by the litigation, the court has complete discretion to grant the writ.

A writ of certiorari may be issued on the basis of the following:

1. Error evident on the face of the record

By issuing a writ of certiorari, a decision of a lower court or a tribunal can be overturned if there is an obvious mistake of law on the face of the record.

2. infringement of natural justice

A writ of certiorari may be issued when the standards of natural justice have been violated.

3. Error of jurisdiction

A writ of certiorari may be granted against a lower court or tribunal that acts without jurisdiction, exceeds its jurisdiction, or fails to exercise the jurisdiction conferred in it by law.

4. Jurisdictional fact

Insufficient jurisdiction may also result from the absence of certain preliminary facts that must exist before a court exercises its authority. These facts are referred to be “jurisdictional” or “collateral.”

Case Law References:

• Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs v. Sk Ali Ahmed, 40 DLR (AD) 170; 48 DLR (AD) 20.
  Even though the statute is silent, notice must be given if a person’s right, interest, property, or character is to be affected. When the law mandates service of notice, the authority cannot evade this obligation.
• Regional Transport Authority of Dhaka versus Momin Motor Company (1958) 10 DLR 284
  A writ of certiorari was granted when a quasi-judicial entity, such as the regional Transport Authority, issued an order negatively impacting a person’s interests without his knowledge.
• Ashraf Ali & Others v. Bangladesh, 5 BLT (AD) 261
  The learned Judges of the High Court Division exceeded their jurisdiction when they exercised their certiorari authority to overturn the decision of a lower court.

                  3. Writ of Mandamus

Mandamus is Latin for “we command.” By writ of mandamus, the superior court orders any individual, corporation, lower court, or government to perform a defined public duty related to their office. This writ is issued when a lower court has refused to exercise the jurisdiction vested in it, or when a public official has refused to comply with the law. In accordance with sub-clause I of clause (a) of subparagraph (2) of article 102 of the Constitution the High Court Division may direct a person performing tasks related to the affairs of the Republic or a local authority to comply with the law. This remedy is accessible when a person’s legal rights, as opposed to contractual rights, are breached. The applicant must demonstrate that he has a legal right to the fulfilment of a legal obligation by the individual or entity against whom the writ is sought.

The following requirements must be met by the petitioner before a writ of mandamus can be issued:

(i) Legal duty:

A legal obligation must have been imposed on the authority, and the fulfilment of that obligation must be mandatory, not voluntary or discretionary. There must be a right for the applicant to compel the opponent to undertake some obligation. Therefore, if the government grants dearness allowance to its employees at its own discretion, there is no legal obligation and a writ of mandamus cannot be filed against the government for fulfilment of such duty. Such a duty must be statutory, i.e. imposed by the constitution, another statute, or some rule of common law, but should not be contractual in certain circumstances. However, the writ of mandamus may be issued for the enforcement of such a duty if discretionary power is conferred on the authority and statutory provisions are made for the exercise of such power. This obligation must be of a public character. The writ of mandamus may be issued if the public authority vested with discretionary power abuses the power, exceeds it, acts maliciously, fails to apply its mind, or takes irrelevant circumstances into account.

(ii) Legal privilege:

The petitioner must possess legal standing. Thus, when a petitioner claimed that he was passed over for promotion by the government and it was determined that he was not qualified for the position, his petition was denied.

(iii) Demand and refusal:

A demand for justice and its denial must precede the petition for a writ of mandamus. In Halsbury’s Laws of England, it is stated: “as a general rule, the order will not be granted unless the party complained of knew what he was required to do, so that he could weigh whether or not to comply, and it must be shown by evidence that there was a distinct demand of that which the party seeking the mandamus wishes to enforce, and that demand was refused.”

(iv) Good faith:

A request for mandamus must have been submitted in good faith and without any ulterior motive or covert objective. Even though a petition for mandamus is filed in good faith, it will not be granted if it is intended to annoy the respondent or exact personal revenge.

 Case Law References:

• Government of Bangladesh vs. Zamiruddin Ahmed, 1 BLD (HCD) 304
  Mandamus may be issued even though no demand for justice has been made previous to the filing of the writ petition if specific circumstances suggest that a demand for justice would be useless.
• M. Walid Ahmed Chowdhury versus Mahfuzul Huq Chowdhury, 8 DLR 429 (1956).
  A mandamus will not be issued unless the party seeking it has not only stated on affidavit that he demanded of the party against whom the mandamus is sought to be enforced by the writ and that such demand was refused, but has also satisfied the court that this is a principle that has been universally accepted and insisted upon as an essential and invariable condition for the issuance of the writ.

                    4. Writ of Prohibition 

Another type of common writ in Bangladesh is called prohibition. The term prohibition refers to a preventive writ. It empowers the High Court Division to prevent a court, tribunal, authority, or person from engaging in conduct that is prohibited by law. A writ of prohibition is appropriate where there is a lack or excess of jurisdiction, an abuse of power, or a violation of the principle of natural justice.

If judicial or quasi-judicial authorities issue an order that is illegal or exceeds the court’s jurisdiction, the aggrieved party may file a writ petition with the superior court, i.e. the High Court Division of the Supreme Court, and if the court finds the complaint to be valid, it may issue a writ of prohibition against the lower court, i.e. the District Judge Court etc.
Prohibition is the opposite of mandamus in that, although mandamus requires the authority to act, prohibition stops a court or tribunal from acting where it lacks the authority to do so. 

In essence,  writs of  prohibition may be issued on the following grounds: 

i. Absence or excess of jurisdiction

ii. Violation of natural justice

iii. Statute’s Unconstitutionality

iv. Violation of fundamental human rights

When the lack of jurisdiction is clear on the face of the proceedings, not only the injured party but also a third party may file a motion for prohibition. The rationale underpinning this rule is that usurpation of authority constitutes a breach of the royal prerogative and an insult to the crown. Therefore, it is irrelevant who informs the court about the usurpation.

However, administrative authority cannot  be prohibited from performing administrative, executive, or ministerial duties. Similarly, it would not lie against the legislature to prevent it from passing or enforcing a law.

                     5. Writ of Quo-Warranto 

     The final type of writ in Bangladesh that will be discussed in this article is called writ of quo-warranto.  The term quo-wattanto means  “what is your authority” in Latin. It is judicial  remedy against an occupant or usurper of an independent public office, franchise, or liberty. It imposes jurisdiction and authority on the judiciary to control executive conduct in terms of making appointments to public positions contrary to relevant statutory provisions, so protecting citizens from being denied a public post to which they may be entitled. In a writ of quo warranto, the petitioner challenges the legitimacy of the claim of the incumbent of a public office. Therefore, this writ can be requested by anyone, regardless of whether they have a personal stake in the outcome.
The purpose of the writ of quo warranto is to prevent a person who has illegitimately seized a public office from remaining in that position. Therefore, an application for a writ of quo warranto challenging the legitimacy and validity of an appointment to a public position may be filed by any private individual, even if he has no personal stake in the matter.
Before the quo warranto can be issued, the following specifications must be met:

i. . Before issuing the writ, the court must be convinced that the post in question is public in nature and that the occupant lacks the legal authority to retain said office. This writ will not lie in relation to a private office, such as a private school’s governing board.

ii. The position must be substantive in nature. The phrase “substantive character” indicates that the office in question must be independent. 

iii. The office must be created by statute or the constitution. 

iv. The holder must have made a legitimate claim to the office. 

 Quo warranto is a discretionary remedy, and the petitioner has no inherent right to obtain this writ. Taking into account the facts and circumstances of the case, the court may decline to grant this writ. This may include situations when the issues of a writ would be vexatious, where the petitioner has consented, or where it would be pointless since the incumbent of the office in question has resigned. It may also be denied if there is a simple electoral irregularity.

A writ of quo warranto may also be denied on the grounds that the petitioner has access to alternative statutory remedies. Thus, when it was sought to issue a writ of quo warranto against a member of the State legislature, it was denied on the grounds that an election petition provided an alternative remedy.

Case Law References: 

• The District Registrar and Others v. Mohammad Abdur Rab Mia, 19 BLD (AD) 24.
  The petitioner did not appear before the writ court to establish a public right; rather, he did so to further his own interests. A quo warranto cannot be used in such a manner or for such a purpose.
• Sajda Parvin v. Bangladesh, 40 DLR (AD) 178; Ahmed Nazir v. Bangladesh, 27 DLR 199; Alam Ara Huq v. Bangladesh, 42 DLR 98.
  No public office can be held without a legitimate claim to that office.

Are you planning to do a writ or looking for criminal and civil remedies in Bangladesh?

Tahmidur Rahman Remura Wahid TRW is a full-service law firm that has been dealing with Writ-related problems on a regular basis since its inception through its qualified and experienced lawyers.

If you require any assistance or consultation, please visit our office or contact us at +8801779127165 or +8801847220062 (WhatsApp) or by email- info@trfirm.com.

E-mail: info@trfirm.com
Phone: +8801847220062 or +8801779127165 or +8801708080817

Address: House 410, Road 29, Mohakhali DOHS, Dhaka 1206