Major Achievements of BELA — and What They Mean for Businesses, Cities, and Communities in Bangladesh

TRW Law Firm Insight & Compliance Guide (2025)

Breadcrumbs: Home › Insights › Environmental & Planning Law › Major Achievements of BELA

Executive Summary (for featured snippet)

Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA) has helped drive many of the country’s most consequential environmental reforms—spanning specialized courts, mandatory public consultation in Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA), wetlands and river protection, ship-breaking and hazardous-waste rules, noise control, brick-kiln regulation, and a long line of court directions that safeguarded forests, parks, flood flow zones, Jaflong’s ecologically critical habitat, and more. For businesses, these milestones translate into stricter permitting, higher accountability for pollution and land use, and greater exposure to public participation and litigation risk—but also clearer rules for sustainable operations.
This TRW Law Firm guide converts BELA’s achievements into practical compliance checklists, sector-specific implications, and board-level actions.

Why this guide matters for you

• If you build: DAP, flood flow zone protection, and riverbank demarcation have reshaped where and how you can develop.
• If you manufacture or extract: Noise standards, brick-kiln law, hazardous-waste rules, ship-breaking regulations, and court orders on stone extraction and clay mining govern daily operations.
• If you finance or insure: Environmental courts and participatory EIA materially increase litigation, regulatory, and reputational risk.
• If you govern: River Commission mandates, public-park protection, and village/community forestry obligations reshape land administration and enforcement priorities.

A quick timeline of highlights

• 2000: Wetlands law (Act No. 36 of 2000). Environment courts first set up (later consolidated under the Environment Court Act, 2010).
• 2006: Noise Pollution Control Rules. DAP (Dhaka) approved under the Master Plan.
• 2010: Public consultation in EIA becomes mandatory; pro-people Social Forestry Rules; Environment Court Act, 2010 framework.
• 2011: Ship Breaking and Recycling Rules; Hazardous Wastes and Ship-Breaking (Wastes) Management Rules.
• 2013: Brick Manufacturing and Kiln Setting (Control) Act; National River Protection Commission Act establishes the River Commission; proposed water privatization removed from Water Bill.
• 2015: Courts consider “Water Stress” area declarations.
• Landmark court directions & enforcement (various years): Hydraulic horns regulation; lead-free petrol and CNG expansion; BGMEA demolition order; Dhaka river demarcation; protection of flood flow zones; recovery of parks/playgrounds; removal of illegal structures at St. Martin’s; Jaflong declared ECA with stone extraction/crushing halted and forest restoration; curbs on wrongful shrimp cultivation; forest and hill-razing protections; Netrokona clay extraction stopped; protection of Bayezid Bostami turtles; fisheries leasing reset in favour of cooperatives; farmers’ lands shielded at Narayanganj; relocation of polluting tanneries to Savar.

Board takeaway: Environmental due diligence is no longer optional; it is a core fiduciary control. BELA’s legacy means courts, regulators, and communities expect science-grounded compliance and transparency.

Institutional & Procedural Milestones

1) Environment Courts (set up in 2000; consolidated by the Environment Court Act, 2010)

What changed
Specialized courts created a fast, expert forum for environmental offences and disputes. The 2010 Act strengthened jurisdictional clarity, procedures, and remedies.

For businesses

• Greater enforcement certainty: Violations are more likely to be prosecuted effectively.
• Higher litigation exposure: Environmental claims—private or public interest—now find a natural forum.

TRW compliance checklist

• Maintain a litigation-ready EHS file: permits, EIA/ESIA baselines, monitoring logs, stack/effluent test results, grievance registers.
• Ensure incident reporting protocols are documented and evidence-backed.

How TRW helps
Early case assessment, strategic defence or negotiated compliance, expert evidence preparation, and settlement structuring that aligns with operational realities.

2) Public Consultation in EIA (mandatory from 2010)

What changed
Section 12 of the 2010 amendment to the Environment Conservation framework mandates public disclosure and consultation in EIAs.

For businesses

• No quiet approvals: Projects require stakeholder engagement and defensible response matrices.
• Disclosure risk: Gaps between design and community expectations can surface—and be litigated.

TRW compliance checklist

• Publish plain-language summaries of impacts/mitigations.
• Build a consultation log with minutes, attendance, translations, and issue-tracking.
• Ensure feedback-to-design traceability (what you changed and why).

How TRW helps
Designing consultation plans, facilitating multilingual hearings, drafting response matrices, and aligning EIA documents with international lender standards (IFC PS/World Bank ESF).

3) Wetlands Law (Act No. 36 of 2000)

What changed
Dedicated statutory protection for wetlands, crucial to hydrology, biodiversity, and disaster resilience.

For businesses & municipalities

• Land-use filters: Projects in and around wetlands face tighter screening, buffers, and compensatory plans.

TRW compliance checklist

• Obtain hydrological assessments and wetland delineations.
• Include no-net-loss or offset plans where unavoidable impacts occur.

4) Pro-people Social Forestry Rules (2010)

What changed
Community forestry models gained legal scaffolding, prioritising access and benefits for local communities.

For forestry, energy, and infrastructure

• Community benefit sharing and participation are governance requirements; tokenism invites challenge.

TRW compliance checklist

• Draft benefit-sharing agreements with clear tenure and grievance channels.
• Map indigenous/local user rights during planning and compensate/mitigate fairly.

5) Ship-Breaking & Hazardous Wastes Rules (2011)

What changed
Two rule sets formalised ship-breaking yard safety and trans-boundary hazardous-waste controls.

For ship-recycling, logistics, and ports

• Pre-arrival inventories, safe dismantling plans, hazard containment, and worker protection are enforceable obligations.

TRW compliance checklist

• Maintain Inventory of Hazardous Materials (IHM) and yard HSE training records.
• Implement hazard segregation, PPE programmes, and medical surveillance.

6) Brick Manufacturing and Kiln Setting (Control) Act, 2013

What changed
Modernised the kiln regime—relocations, technology upgrades, emissions controls.

For brick makers and builders

• Technology, siting, and emission limits are now more strictly policed.
• Procurement risk: Developers that buy from non-compliant kilns face reputational and contractual exposure.

TRW compliance checklist

• Vet vendors for kiln type, emission factors, and location compliance.
• Include EHS warranties and termination rights in supply contracts.

7) National River Protection Commission (2013)

What changed
A statutory commission to coordinate river protection, demarcation, and anti-encroachment actions.

For urban planners, utilities, and riverside industries

• Setback compliance and demarcation adherence are non-negotiable.
• Failure triggers demolition orders and land-title disputes.

TRW compliance checklist

• Commission independent boundary surveys; align masterplans to legally demarcated banks.
• Integrate flood conveyance modelling into design.

8) Water Bill (2013): Privatization proposal removed

What changed
Safeguarded public interest by excluding privatization clauses.

For utilities and PPPs

• Water PPPs must centre on service quality and sustainability, not proprietary rights to water.

TRW compliance checklist

• Structure PPPs with clear service KPIs, tariff transparency, and social safeguards.

9) Noise Pollution Control Rules (2006)

What changed
Ambient noise standards across zones; limits for sources and times.

For manufacturers, builders, event managers

• Measurement and mitigation are integral; violations can prompt closures or fines.

TRW compliance checklist

• Maintain calibrated meters and a noise monitoring plan (construction phases included).
• Adopt barriers, scheduling, and equipment maintenance for compliance.

10) Court directions on hydraulic horns; unleaded petrol; CNG rollout

What changed
Road-traffic noise curbs and fuel-quality improvements reduced urban pollution.

For automotive fleets & fuel retailers

• Maintenance logs, horn policies, and fuel-quality assurances are part of compliance hygiene.

TRW compliance checklist

• Fleet SOPs must ban hydraulic/pressure horns; keep enforcement records.
• Ensure supplier certifications for fuel standards.

11) DAP (Dhaka) approved in 2006

What changed
A sustainability-oriented Detailed Area Plan under the Master Plan: zoning, densities, flood flow protection.

For developers and financiers

• Entitlements hinge on DAP consistency; variances face scrutiny.

TRW compliance checklist

• Run DAP conformity screenings before land aggregation.
• Capture flood flow & drainage impacts in concept design.

Landmark Judicial & Enforcement Outcomes

BGMEA Building: Demolition ordered (built on swamps)

Signal sent
Even prominent structures are not insulated from wetland, planning, or public-trust violations.

Business lesson

• Title and planning diligence must look beyond paper: check hydrology history, public trust overlays, and cumulative impacts.

Dhaka Riverbank Demarcation & Flood Flow Zone Protection

Signal sent
Courts enforced demarcation and protected flood flow zones from real-estate encroachment (e.g., Modhumoti, Jamuna, Ashiyan townships).

Business lesson

• Encroachment equals demolition risk. Development finance requires hydraulic & cadastral certainty.

Recovery of Parks and Playgrounds; Removal of Illegal Structures on St. Martin’s

Signal sent
Urban commons and ecologically sensitive islands are public assets; private capture is reversible.

Business lesson

• Concessions near parks/ECAs require heightened scrutiny, conservation offsets, and community access plans.

Jaflong: Declared Ecologically Critical Area (ECA); stone mining halted; crushers removed; forest restoration

Signal sent
ECA status can eliminate entire business models (e.g., stone extraction/crushing) and demand ecosystem restoration.

Business lesson

• Map ECA/PA buffers in site selection. Build exit and restoration provisions into contracts.

Wrongful Shrimp Cultivation Curbed; ESIA Required in Coastal/Khulna Areas

Signal sent
Environmental and social harms (including salinity intrusion) will be judged against community rights and scientific baselines.

Business lesson

• Aquaculture and agro-estate models need water-rights engineering, salinity control, and community agreements upfront.

Forest & Hill Protections:

• 51 acres of Cox’s Bazar reserve forest saved from housing
• Uttaran Housing hill-razing halted
• Village forestry rules considered; forest rights protection
• Jaflong reserve forest restoration

Signal sent
Natural forests and hills are no-go without compelling public interest and strict safeguards.

Business lesson

• Expect forestry rights mapping, slope stabilisation, and no-net-loss commitments in clearances.

Netrokona White Clay Extraction Stopped; Fisheries Leasing Reset; Bayezid Bostami Turtles Protected

Signal sent
Biodiversity, community livelihoods, and sacred/natural heritage are judicially cognizable interests.

Business lesson

• Resource extraction and leasing must pass biodiversity screens and transparency tests; sacred/natural heritage is a hard constraint.

Farmers’ Lands in Narayanganj Protected from Forced Economic-Zone Acquisition

Signal sent
Economic development cannot override due process and land rights.

Business lesson

• Economic zones must integrate FPIC-style engagement, fair compensation, and livelihood restoration.

Tanneries Relocated from Hazaribagh to Savar Industrial Estate

Signal sent
Chronic polluters face forced relocation and centralised ETP mandates.

Business lesson

• High-impact sectors need clustered infrastructure (CETP/solid-waste parks) and traceable effluent chains.

Sector-by-Sector Implications (2025 Outlook)

Real estate & infrastructure

• Site selection: exclude ECAs, wetlands, flood conveyance corridors, and forests at the outset.
• Permitting: align with DAP, river demarcations, and master-plan overlays.
• Design: embed nature-based solutions (retention, infiltration, green buffers).

Manufacturing & extractives

• Air/noise: meet Noise Rules (2006) and kiln emission standards.
• Water/effluent: CETP connectivity, mass-balance monitoring, groundwater abstraction permits, and reuse targets.
• Waste: hazardous-waste manifests, cradle-to-grave tracking, and emergency response drills.

Shipping, ports & ship-recycling

• IHM (Inventory of Hazardous Materials) and safe-dismantling SOPs; medical surveillance; trans-boundary compliance for wastes.

Agribusiness & aquaculture

• Water rights and salinity controls; ESIA for coastal operations; community-benefit frameworks.

Cities, utilities & PPPs

• Public-interest tests for water services; transparent tariffs; green infrastructure; park/playground protection.

Governance & Disclosure: Board-Level Actions

1. Adopt an Environmental & Social Responsibility Policy
   Embed roles, thresholds, and escalation paths (including when to seek court-approved settlements or abide by demolition orders).
2. Create a “BELA-aware” Compliance Calendar

• EIA public-consultation windows
• Monitoring and audit cycles (noise, air, effluent)
• Renewal/variation deadlines; fishery or forest-interface engagements

1. Institutionalise Stakeholder Engagement

• Maintain a grievance mechanism with time-bound resolution.
• Publish a community feedback registry and how it changed design.

1. Strengthen Environmental Contracting

• Supplier and contractor EHS warranties; right to audit; suspension/termination for violation.
• Restoration bonds for high-risk works.

1. Assurance & Reporting

• Third-party verification of key indicators; board dashboards for EHS.
• Publish plain-language impact updates online.

How TRW Law Firm supports you end-to-end

• Permitting & Strategy: EIA/ESIA scoping, lender-grade documentation, compliance road-mapping.
• Stakeholder Governance: Consultation design, multilingual facilitation, benefit-sharing agreements.
• Regulatory & Litigation: Representation before environment courts and higher judiciary, negotiated undertakings, demolition/relocation strategies.
• Transactions: Environmental due diligence for M\&A/financing, ESG covenants, representations & warranties, indemnities.
• Operations & Audits: Compliance audits, monitoring frameworks, incident investigations, regulator engagement.
• Capacity Building: Board and plant-level training on Noise Rules, kiln standards, hazardous waste, and ship-recycling compliance.

Explore more of our thought leadership here: TRW Articles & Guides

FAQs (Practical & candid)

Q1. We obtained a permit years ago—can court directions still jeopardize our asset?
Yes. Multiple precedents (e.g., structures in wetlands, flood flow zones, or parklands) show that defective or ultra vires permits don’t inoculate you. Build defensibility with fresh baselines, conformity reviews, and mitigation/exit plans.

Q2. How do we prove meaningful public consultation?
Document everything: notices, attendance, translations, Q\&A matrices, and the design changes you adopted based on feedback. Courts look for process quality and traceability, not box-ticking.

Q3. Our site touches a river buffer. What’s acceptable?
Assume zero net increase in flood risk; maintain/set back lines as per demarcation; prefer removable, low-impact edge treatments, and ensure no effluent reaches the river untreated.

Q4. Are noise and air standards actively enforced?
Yes. With specialised courts and citizen oversight, monitoring gaps can trigger orders. Maintain calibrated devices, third-party tests, and maintenance logs.

Q5. How do PPPs in water avoid controversy without privatization?
Focus on service KPIs, resilience, and equity. Structure contracts around availability payments, not resource ownership.

Q6. We operate near an ECA (like Jaflong). What is the risk posture?
Expect exclusion or stringent conditions. Prepare alternatives analysis, offset plans, and closure/restoration provisions, reviewed by independent experts.

Q7. Is relocation (e.g., tanneries) a real possibility for other sectors?
Yes, for persistent non-compliance. Prioritise clustered treatment, shared infrastructure, and verifiable outcomes to avoid disruptive orders.

Q8. Can we regularise earlier non-compliance?
Often yes—via consent variations, supplementary mitigation, and time-bound undertakings—but only with credible monitoring and transparency.

Board Room Toolkit: Immediate Actions (Next 90 Days)

• Commission a compliance gap audit against Noise Rules (2006), Brick-Kiln Act (2013), hazardous-waste and ship-breaking rules (2011), and local DAP/river demarcations.
• Map critical overlays (wetlands, flood flow zones, forests, ECAs) across all current and planned sites.
• Stand up a consultation SOP with templates, registers, and translation support.
• Stress-test all title and planning approvals for public-trust risks (parks, islands, riverbanks).
• Create a remediation playbook: what if a court orders partial demolition or relocation?
• Train site leaders on evidence-quality: sampling, calibration, logging, photo/video chain-of-custody.

Detailed Commentary on the Achievements You Listed (with compliance pointers)

1. Environment courts setup (2000; current framework 2010 Act)
   Creates an expert adjudicatory channel. Pointer: Prepare litigation-ready documentation and corrective-action pipelines.
2. Public consultation in EIA mandatory (2010)
   Shifts approvals into the public domain. Pointer: Invest in transparent designs and issue-tracking.
3. Wetlands law (2000, Act 36)
   Flags hydrological functions as public interest. Pointer: Avoid wetland encroachment; build offsets if unavoidable.
4. Pro-people Social Forestry Rules (2010)
   Centres communities in forestry. Pointer: Benefit-sharing agreements with grievance paths.
5. Ship-Breaking & Hazardous-Wastes Rules (2011)
   Controls for worker safety and toxic flows. Pointer: IHMs, yard SOPs, medical surveillance, and compliant disposal chains.
6. Brick Manufacturing & Kiln Setting (Control) Act, 2013
   Modernisation and siting; emission caps. Pointer: Vet kiln tech; embed EHS warranties in procurement.
7. River Commission (2013)
   Coordinates protection and anti-encroachment. Pointer: Survey to legal boundaries; plan for set-backs.
8. Water Bill (2013) — privatization proposal removed
   Keeps water in public trust. Pointer: PPPs to focus on service outcomes, not resource ownership.
9. Noise Pollution Rules (2006)
   Ambient limits and controls. Pointer: Zone-wise monitoring and mitigation.
10. Regulation of hydraulic horns; unleaded petrol; CNG rollout
    Air/noise health breakthrough. Pointer: Fleet SOPs, maintenance logs, supplier certifications.
11. DAP approved (2006)
    Sustainability in urban form. Pointer: Confirm DAP conformity before land banking.
12. Village forestry rules considered; forest rights protection
    Elevates community forestry governance. Pointer: Rights mapping and co-management.
13. 61 fisheries leases cancelled; settled with cooperatives
    Curbs non-transparent leasing. Pointer: Integrity checks for concessions; community preference rules.
14. Interim orders to consider “Water Stress” (2015)
    Anticipatory governance of scarcity. Pointer: Water audits; efficiency and reuse projects.
15. Farmers’ lands at Narayanganj protected from forced EZ acquisition
    Due process and fairer acquisition. Pointer: FPIC-style engagement, livelihood restoration.
16. BGMEA building demolition
    Illegality trumps sunk costs. Pointer: Deep diligence on site legality and hydrology.
17. Tanneries relocated to Savar
    Pollution clusters with shared treatment. Pointer: Align with CETP and waste-park infrastructure.
18. Dhaka riverbank demarcation enforced
    Buffers and flood conveyance preserved. Pointer: Don’t speculate inside riverbeds; validate cadastral lines.
19. Flood flow zones protected from encroachment
    Resilience over real-estate sprawl. Pointer: Hydraulic modelling in concept design.
20. Public parks/playgrounds recovered
    Urban commons preserved. Pointer: Expect denial of conversions; propose enhancements instead.
21. Illegal structures on St. Martin’s removed
    Island ecology protected. Pointer: Strict conservation overlays; eco-tourism must be low-impact.
22. Jaflong ECA; stone mining/crushing halted; forest restoration
    Ecological primacy. Pointer: Avoid ECAs; if legacy assets exist, plan compliant exits.
23. Wrongful shrimp cultivation curtailed; ESIA required in coastal areas
    Social/environmental safeguards in aquaculture. Pointer: Salinity control, community covenants.
24. 51 acres Cox’s Bazar reserve forest preserved
    No routine conversion of reserves. Pointer: Uphold reserve status; explore alternative sites.
25. Uttaran Housing hill-razing halted
    Slope and landscape stewardship. Pointer: Geotechnical and erosion controls; avoid mass grading.
26. White clay extraction at Netrokona stopped
    Biodiversity and social impacts outweigh extraction. Pointer: Comprehensive ESIA and offsets rarely justify sensitive extractions.
27. Bayezid Bostami turtles protected
    Sacred/natural heritage is binding. Pointer: Heritage impact statements for nearby works.

What good compliance looks like (evidence standard)

• Traceable monitoring: Meters and labs with calibration and chain-of-custody.
• Verifiable stakeholder process: Minutes, translations, attendance, action logs.
• Engineered safeguards: CETPs, dust/noise barriers, stormwater controls, spill plans.
• Spatial defensibility: GIS overlays showing ECAs, wetlands, rivers, floodways, reserves.
• Contracts that bite: EHS warranties, audit rights, step-in/suspension clauses, restoration bonds.
• Transparency: Plain-language public summaries and easy grievance routes.

Call TRW before you: acquire land, tender a plant, finance a project, or face an inspection

Bring us in at concept stage—it’s where the biggest risk/Cost-of-Change savings live. We’ll create a no-surprises pathway that regulators, lenders, and communities can support.

Summary Table — BELA Achievements & Corporate Implications

Contact TRW Law Firm (Bangladesh • Dubai)

Call us:
+8801708000660 · +8801847220062 · +8801708080817

Email:
info@trfirm.com · info@trwbd.com · info@tahmidur.com

Offices:
Dhaka: House 410, Road 29, Mohakhali DOHS
Dubai: Rolex Building, L-12 Sheikh Zayed Road

About TRW Law Firm:
TRW is Bangladesh’s largest cross-border law firm, advising governments, financiers, and industry on complex environmental, planning, and infrastructure matters. We combine regulatory depth, courtroom experience, and transaction fluency to help clients achieve bankable, socially legitimate, and court-defensible outcomes.