Arbitration and Long-Term Contracts

by Tahmidur Remura Wahid | Sep 30, 2025 | Uncategorized | 0 comments

Arbitration and Long-Term Contracts: The TRW Law Firm Playbook for Foreign Companies (Bangladesh ⇄ Dubai ⇄ London)

Who this is for: Foreign investors, EPC contractors, energy and resources companies, telecom operators, infrastructure developers, distributors, tech and data providers, trading houses, sovereign and quasi-sovereign counterparties, funds and lenders engaging in long-horizon commercial relationships with Bangladeshi parties—or operating regionally through Dubai and London.

Why it matters: Long-term contracts are relationship architecture. They finance mines and LNG terminals, underpin telecom spectrum rollouts, anchor offtake/throughput at ports, keep industrial plants supplied, and secure multi-year data, cloud, and technology capacity. Because these agreements run for 5–25+ years, change is guaranteed—in prices, regulation, technology, markets, geopolitics, and corporate control. That is precisely why arbitration—flexible, confidential, enforceable—is the dispute clause of choice. Done right, arbitration supports continuity of performance and constructive renegotiation instead of scorched-earth litigation.

Need counsel now? Speak with TRW’s cross-border arbitration and projects team in Dhaka, Dubai, and London. Explore our work and get in touch via tahmidurrahman.com (internal).

1) Long-Term Contracts: What Makes Them Different (and Fragile)

Long-term contracts are not just “long” versions of short contracts. They are ecosystems with:

Interdependence: Performance in Year 7 depends on what happened in Year 2. Changes cascade across pricing, volume, specifications, logistics, and financing covenants.
Capital intensity: Debt, equity, vendor financing, and offtake securitisation create non-contractual stakeholders (banks, ECAs, bondholders) whose expectations must be managed.
Regulatory touchpoints: Approvals, licences, FX rules, subsidies, localisation, data residency, sanctions, competition/merger control—these evolve.
Operational complexity: Multi-party chains (operator, supplier, sub-contractors, JV partners, warehouse/terminal operators, carriers, labs, certifiers) multiply failure points.
Information asymmetry: Site-specific facts (ore quality, well productivity, fiber faults, weather windows), counterparties’ true costs, and shifting market indices influence behaviour and bargaining power.

These realities make disputes predictable: performance shortfalls, cost blowouts, market shocks, change-in-law, force majeure, price reopeners, early termination, and liability caps. The goal of contract design and dispute planning is not to avoid every dispute (impossible), but to shape how disputes play out so the relationship and asset continue to deliver value.

2) Why Arbitration Is the Natural Fit

Arbitration is the operating system for high-stakes, long-horizon deals because it offers:

Enforceability: Awards are recognised and enforceable under the New York Convention in most trading jurisdictions—critical where counterparties or assets are cross-border.
Neutrality: Parties avoid “home-court” litigation risk. Choosing a neutral seat (e.g., London, Dubai/DIFC, Singapore) averts forum battles.
Confidentiality: Protects pricing formulas, trade secrets, plant data, and sensitive renegotiation history.
Flexibility: Tailored procedures: technical hot-tubbing, document schedules, bifurcation, partial awards, emergency relief, agreed e-discovery scoping.
Continuity: Tribunals are comfortable issuing orders that preserve performance (e.g., provisional measures, “keep-the-gas-flowing” style directions) pending final award.
Expertise: Parties select arbitrators with sector expertise (energy pricing models; telco SLAs; mining offtake norms; data/AI contracts).

But arbitration works best when you design for it at signature: choose the right seat and rules, anticipate multi-party realities, wire in escalation, and make price and hardship mechanisms arbitrable with usable evidence standards.

3) The Sectors Where Long-Term = High-Stakes (and How Disputes Show Up)

Energy & Resources (LNG, pipeline/throughput, PSCs, power PPAs, mining offtake/royalties).

Disputes: Take-or-pay, ship-or-pay, calorific value/quality disputes, index/hedge failures, change-in-law (carbon, royalties), force majeure vs. market collapse, delivery windows, measurement uncertainty.
Arb levers: Price reopeners tied to indices/baskets; expert determination for narrow pricing math; arbitration for broader contractual issues; technical hot-tubbing.

Telecom & Digital Infrastructure (IRUs, data centers, cloud capacity, long-haul fiber, spectrum sharing).

Disputes: SLA non-conformance, latency/uptime credits escalations, cross-connect bottlenecks, relocation/upgrade obligations, data localisation shifts.
Arb levers: Tiered SLAs with capped credits + LDs; urgent interim relief to maintain service continuity; confidentiality walls for sensitive network maps.

Industrial Supply & OEM/After-Sales (framework supply, MRO spares, service contracts).

Disputes: Obsolescence, spares inflation, change in standards, IP around upgrades/retrofits, warranty vs. misuse, “most-favoured pricing” arguments.
Arb levers: Technical expert panels, calibrated notice/inspection, carve-outs to caps for wilful misconduct or IP theft.

Large-Scale Construction & EPC (with O&M tails).

Disputes: Delay/liquidated damages, design responsibility, interface risk, unforeseen ground conditions, change-in-law, early termination rights.
Arb levers: Dispute boards feeding into arbitration; records discipline (daily site logs; Primavera schedules); agreed delay analysis methodology.

Technology, Data & AI (multi-year SaaS, data supply, training/computing capacity, algorithm performance).

Disputes: Performance drift, fairness/ethics obligations, data provenance, audit rights, model accuracy SLAs, export controls on chips/models.
Arb levers: Benchmarks and test harnesses; confidentiality/AEO regimes; emergency arbitrator for access preservation.

4) Bangladesh ⇄ Dubai ⇄ London: How TRW Aligns the Triangle

A foreign company dealing with Bangladeshi counterparties—and coordinating through Dubai and London—must harmonise governing law, seat, enforcement, and interim relief:

Governing law: English law is widely preferred for long-term commercial deals (predictable contract principles, sophisticated damages jurisprudence). UAE parties sometimes choose UAE law (or DIFC law) for onshore/offshore coherence. Bangladesh law may govern localised aspects (land, permits, tax incentives, labour), often via split governance (core commercial = English law; site/permit appendices = Bangladesh law compliance).
Seat of arbitration:
London (LCIA/ICC): Highly respected, strong court support for interim measures and evidence.
Dubai (DIAC; DIFC-LCIA legacy; ADGM/ADGM Arbitration): Neutral, increasingly sophisticated, regionally convenient for MENA operations and enforcement.
Singapore (SIAC): Often selected for Asia-centric trade or where counterparties have Asian footprints.
Interim relief: London, DIFC/ADGM, and Singapore courts are arbitration-friendly and adept at freezing orders, evidence preservation, and anti-suit relief—critical to protect receivables and avoid asset dissipation.
Enforcement planning: Identify the jurisdictions where assets live: Bangladesh plants/inventory; UAE receivables/stock; UK bank accounts. Draft the arbitration clause and seat to facilitate execution against those asset locales.

TRW designs seat + law + forum shopping coherently, not opportunistically: the selection must match enforcement geography, industry norms, bank/ECA expectations, and the remedies you’re most likely to need (e.g., specific performance vs. damages).

5) The Clause Architecture of Resilient Long-Term Contracts

Below is a TRW clause blueprint that we adapt per sector and transaction:

5.1 Price, Indexation, and Reopeners

Index baskets: Use blended baskets (e.g., Brent/JKM/HH + freight + local CPI) with floor/ceiling collars to dampen volatility.
Reopener triggers: “Material market change” thresholds (e.g., ±20–30% vs. baseline for X months), FX shock triggers, tax/carbon triggers.
Procedure: Good-faith negotiation → short expert determination on math (not legal interpretation) → arbitration for scope/termination/LDs.
Evidence: Agreed data sources (Platts/Argus/ICE), audit rights, API data snapshots escrowed.

5.2 Volume, Flexibility & Take-or-Pay / Ship-or-Pay

Flex windows: Seasonal/operational flexibility bands (e.g., +/-10% MQ).
Banking/Make-up: Under-lift and over-lift banked with expiry; carryover rules; credit offsets vs. LDs.
Excuse events: Plant outages, force majeure; evidence requirements; mitigation and substitution.

5.3 Change in Law / Tax & Royalty / Carbon

Scope: Define “change” (statute, regulation, binding guidance, court decisions; includes extraterritorial sanctions).
Adjustment: Pass-through mechanics; renegotiation window; if unresolved, arbitration limited to quantum/allocation; termination right only after cure/mitigation steps.

5.4 Hardship & Force Majeure (FM)

Hardship: Economic imbalance beyond agreed corridor → renegotiation → short expert opinion on impact magnitude → tribunal power to adapt/terminate on defined criteria.
FM: Event taxonomy (epidemics, export bans, cyberattacks, lawful strikes, catastrophic weather); notice clocks; alternative performance; partial FM; extended FM termination.
Interaction: Hardship ≠ FM. Draft to avoid overlap games.

5.5 Quality, Specifications & Testing

Specs: Objective parameters, sampling protocols, independent labs, tie-break labs, chain-of-custody.
Testing: Factory/site acceptance tests; failure consequences (cure, price reduction, replacement, LDs).
Data: Digitally signed logs, sensor telemetry, and “no-tamper” storage for evidentiary weight.

5.6 Service Levels (Telecom/Tech/Data)

KPIs: Uptime/latency/jitter/packet loss; support response/restore; scheduled maintenance rules.
Credits vs. damages: Credits not exclusive remedy for chronic breach; escalate to LDs and termination.
Security & compliance: ISO/SOC obligations; audit rights; incident reporting; data localisation/update obligations.

5.7 ESG, Sanctions, and Export Controls

Sanctions: Warranties on ultimate beneficial ownership and end-use; snap-off termination; cost allocation for lawful cessation.
ESG: Compliance with anti-corruption, modern slavery, environmental and human rights standards; audit and remediation plans; step-in rights for critical breaches.
Export/tech controls: Licensing cooperation; suspension mechanisms where licences delayed/denied.

5.8 IP/Technology, Licensing & Upgrades (Tech and Industrial)

Licence scope: Field of use, territories, sublicensing, open-source policies.
Upgrades: Roadmaps, backward compatibility, deprecation windows, LTS (long-term support).
Escrow: Source code/data escrow for catastrophic vendor failure.

5.9 Title, Risk & Security

Title: Retention of title (where valid) vs. security interests/charges; registration obligations.
Risk: Align with Incoterms where physical goods are involved; transitional risk during testing/replacement periods.
Insurance: Mandatory coverages; endorsements; loss payee; subrogation waivers.

5.10 Termination & Step-In

Cure ladders: Notice → cure → supervised cure → step-in/escrow release → termination.
Step-in: For critical infrastructure or regulated services; detailed operator handover; IP rights and indemnities; reversion.
Exit: Unwind logistics, return of data/parts, IP wind-down, tail support.

6) The Arbitration Clause: What Foreign Companies Must Get Right

A. Institution and Rules
Choose rules that support the measures you will likely need:

LCIA (London): efficient case management, strong emergency/expedited tools.
DIAC (Dubai): modernised rules post-reform; regionally sensible; compatible with DIFC/ADGM support.
ICC/SIAC: Versatile, strong emergency arbitrator and consolidation powers.

B. Seat of Arbitration
Seat governs court supervision and the legal framework. London and DIFC/ADGM are arbitration-supportive and commercially sophisticated. The seat is not the same as venue. State the seat expressly.

C. Multi-Tier Escalation

Tier 1: Senior-level negotiation (time-boxed).
Tier 2: Mediation (optional) with no prejudice.
Tier 3: Arbitration (with emergency arbitrator availability).
Draft to avoid pathological preconditions—make time limits clear; state that failure to complete prior tiers does not bar emergency relief.

D. Consolidation & Joinder
Long-term projects spawn multi-contract disputes (EPC, O&M, supply, offtake). Provide for consolidation and joinder across related agreements (ensure compatible arbitration clauses across the suite). Otherwise you end up with parallel proceedings and inconsistent awards.

E. Interim & Emergency Relief
Express tribunal power to grant interim measures and authorise applications to competent courts without waiving arbitration. For service continuity contracts, this is existential.

F. Confidentiality
Make confidentiality obligations explicit and carve out disclosures to regulators, lenders, auditors, and rating agencies.

G. Remedies
Empower tribunals to award specific performance (subject to enforceability in the chosen seat), injunctions, declaratory relief, price adjustments, and ongoing performance orders. In English-law seated arbitrations, tribunals typically have broad powers; DIFC/ADGM frameworks are also supportive.

H. Costs & Funding
Adopt “costs follow the event” with tribunal discretion. Permit third-party funding with disclosure obligations to avoid conflicts.

Model Spine (illustrative, to be tailored by TRW):

Any dispute arising out of or in connection with this Agreement shall be referred to and finally resolved by arbitration under the [LCIA/DIAC/ICC/SIAC] Rules, which Rules are deemed incorporated by reference. The seat (legal place) of arbitration shall be [London/DIFC/ADGM/Singapore]. The tribunal shall consist of [one/three] arbitrator(s). The language of arbitration shall be English. The parties may seek interim or conservatory measures from any court of competent jurisdiction without waiver of arbitration. The tribunal may order specific performance, injunctive, declaratory or other equitable relief where appropriate.

7) Managing Disputes Without Breaking the Relationship

Long-term contracts must be resilient to “dispute while performing.” Here is TRW’s choreography:

Evidence discipline from Day 1:

Agreed document maps (what exists where), naming conventions, and retention.
Digital logs, SCADA/PLC exports, test videos, lab certificates with chain-of-custody.
Email/notice hygiene—who sends/receives, “without prejudice” markers, and dashboarding.

Early case assessment (ECA):

Identify merits, money, timeline, PR/regulatory impact, and settlement corridor within 14–21 days of flare-up.
Stress-test whether you need emergency relief (service continuity; asset preservation).

Dual-track strategy:

Keep the plant running or service delivered while the pricing/quality dispute is arbitrated.
Use partial awards to stabilise issues (e.g., liability split; interim price formula; performance parameters).

Expert evidence done right:

Appoint experts early; lock methodology (e.g., delay analysis technique, sampling protocol).
Consider hot-tubbing to reduce “ships passing in the night.”

Negotiation windows preserved:

Build in reopener checkpoints and standstill agreements to let business teams trade economics for continuity.

8) Dubai Focus: Onshore vs. DIFC/ADGM and Practical Pointers

Choice of law: Onshore UAE law vs. DIFC/ADGM law (common-law style) can materially affect remedies and interpretation. Where a project spans both (e.g., onshore plant + free zone financing), split governance with a master arbitration clause works well.
Institution selection: DIAC is now the leading onshore institution; ADGM has its own arbitration reg. Opt for the forum that matches your operational center of gravity and asset enforcement paths.
Sanctions & re-export: Dubai trading houses must be vigilant about trans-shipment and ultimate end-use; contracts should hard-wire KYC/UBO diligence and audit rights.
VAT and customs: Use the contract to route documentary flows (commercial invoice, CoO, e-gate customs entries) to support zero-rating/export reliefs and speed refunds.

9) London Focus: English Law Governance and Court Support

Predictability: English law’s emphasis on freedom of contract and textual interpretation pairs well with complex long-term drafting.
Interim relief: The English courts are renowned for freezing orders, third-party disclosure, and anti-suit injunctions in support of arbitration.
Market benchmarks: English law’s damages doctrines (e.g., Hadley v Baxendale foreseeability, mitigation) reward parties who keep evidence and act commercially.
Funding & costs: A sophisticated TPF and ATE insurance market reduces budget shocks for protracted arbitrations.

10) Bangladesh Touchpoints You Should Not Miss

Regulatory perimeter: BIDA/BEPZA/Hi-Tech Park approvals, environmental clearances, customs/VAT exemptions, and land/title issues can quietly become contract performance blockers.
FX controls and remittances: Ensure the contract supports Bangladesh Bank approvals for cross-border flows (dividends, service fees, royalty, arbitration award proceeds).
Localisation & tax: Draft gross-up, WHT sharing, and permanent establishment (PE) mitigants when foreign personnel or onshore activities are extended.
Courts and interim relief: While foreign-seated arbitration is typical for neutral enforcement, plan for on-shore protective measures (e.g., security for costs; preservation orders) where Bangladesh assets are at stake.

11) Ten Drafting Mistakes Foreign Companies Keep Making (and How We Fix Them)

Pathological arbitration clauses (missing seat; conflicting institutions; non-existent rules).
Fix: TRW’s vetted clause library; cross-agreement harmonisation.
Inconsistent dispute clauses across the contract suite (EPC vs. O&M vs. offtake).
Fix: Consolidation/joinder mechanics; identical seats/rules where possible.
Price reopeners without evidence rails (which index? which timestamp? which API?).
Fix: Data sources, snapshots, escrow; “math to expert, law to arbitrator.”
Force majeure that doubles as hardship (ambiguous drafting).
Fix: Separate, non-overlapping provisions; decision trees and burdens.
Silence on sanctions/export controls (no snap-off termination or cost allocation).
Fix: Warranties, audit, termination, cost recovery, and evidence obligations.
Notice provisions divorced from operations (wrong recipients; unrealistic clocks).
Fix: Role-based addresses; dashboards; time-zones; multiple channels (email + portal).
No step-in rights in critical services (the system goes dark if vendor fails).
Fix: Step-in triggers, IP licences, staff novation, escrow and reversion.
Jurisdictionally invalid security/ROT (title clauses unenforceable).
Fix: Proper local registrations; intercreditor alignment; warehousing receipts.
Arbitration clause bans interim court relief (accidentally).
Fix: Express carve-out for court interim measures.
Confidentiality that blocks lenders/regulators (you can’t disclose when you must).
Fix: Carve-outs with NDA backstops; clean disclosure protocols.

12) From Kick-Off to Award: TRW’s Lifecycle Support

Deal framing: We set the governing law/seat and compliance perimeter, align the contract suite, and pre-wire evidence.
Bankability: We build document grids (conditions precedent, drawdown packs, expected notices) and align with lender/ECA covenants.
Operationalisation: Playbooks for SLAs, QA/QC, price/volume management, force majeure notices, and sanctions screening.
Early dispute management: ECA within 2–3 weeks; negotiation corridors; emergency relief scripts; hold-separate protocols.
Arbitration conduct: Efficient pleadings, targeted disclosure, calibrated expert work, and partial awards to stabilise performance.
Enforcement: Asset mapping, recognition, security, and collections across Bangladesh, UAE, UK, and beyond.
Reset/renegotiation: Convert awards or imminent outcomes into workable resets that keep projects alive.

13) Practical Checklists (Print-and-Use)

A) Pre-Signature Checklist

■ Define price formula, index basket, FX, and reopener triggers with data sources.
■ Lock volume bands, banking/make-up, and storage/throughput.
■ Separate hardship from force majeure; articulate evidentiary thresholds.
■ Fix governing law, seat, institution, consolidation/joinder, emergency relief.
■ Harmonise dispute clauses across EPC, O&M, supply, offtake.
■ Map regulatory approvals (Bangladesh, UAE, UK) and build change-in-law mechanics.
■ Draft sanctions/export clauses; due diligence pack and audit rights.
■ Secure IP licences, escrow, step-in, and exit plans.
■ Validate security/ROT in each asset locale; align with financing docs.
■ Embed notice logistics (addresses, time-zones, portals) and evidence rails.

B) Live-Contract Dispute Checklist

■ Trigger ECA and identify emergency measures.
■ Preserve status quo performance where possible; seek partial awards if needed.
■ Appoint experts early; lock testing/sampling/delay methodology.
■ Maintain confidentiality; carve-outs for banks/regulators.
■ Document mitigation to protect damages claim.
■ Keep renegotiation doors open with formal standstills.

14) Illustrative Scenarios (Anonymised)

Scenario 1: Gas Supply with Index Shock (Bangladesh buyer, Dubai seller, London seat)
Price spiked 45% for six months; buyer invoked hardship; seller said market volatility ≠ hardship. Contract had a corridor with a reopener at 30% sustained over 90 days. Parties used the agreed math expert (10 days) → confirmed trigger. Tribunal then arbitrated scope of adjustment and duration. Partial award reset price temporarily; operations continued; final award set a new formula for 18 months.

Scenario 2: Fiber IRU SLA Failures (Dubai hub, Bangladesh routes, DIAC rules, DIFC seat)
Chronic latency breaches and disputed credits. TRW deployed emergency arbitrator to compel interim routing while repairs proceeded. Credits applied; tribunal later found chronic breach → LDs activated; no termination as step-in proved effective and service stabilised.

Scenario 3: Mining Offtake Quality (Bangladesh mine, global trader, SIAC)
Sampling protocol gaps led to duelling assays. We enforced the tie-break lab provision and chain-of-custody. Award granted price reduction for a subset of shipments; rejected broad termination claim; parties agreed on a refined protocol post-award.

15) Frequently Asked Questions (Straight Answers)

Q1: We prefer English law. Should we still say “CISG excluded”?
Yes—belt and braces. Keep your governing law clean.

Q2: Can arbitrators order specific performance?
Often yes (subject to the seat and local enforceability). Draft the clause to permit equitable relief; pick a supportive seat (e.g., London, DIFC/ADGM).

Q3: Our contract suite has different arbitration clauses. Is that fatal?
Not fatal, but risky. Harmonise and add consolidation/joinder power; otherwise, parallel proceedings can undermine outcomes.

Q4: Is mediation worth it in long-term deals?
Yes, if time-boxed and paired with the ability to seek emergency relief. It preserves relationships and can narrow issues.

Q5: Can we keep performing while arbitrating price?
Yes. Use partial awards and interim measures. Draft to mandate status-quo performance with escrow/true-up.

Q6: How do we future-proof against sanctions?
Warranties, KYC/UBO diligence, audit rights, snap-off termination, and cost allocation. Keep an eye on re-export risk through Dubai.

Q7: What about data/AI long-term contracts?
Define metrics (accuracy, bias, drift), audit, update cadence, and export controls on chips/models. Arbitration should include protective confidentiality and expert protocols.

16) How TRW Partners with You

Dhaka: We navigate Bangladesh regulatory pathways, on-the-ground enforcement, and government interfaces.
Dubai: We structure MENA trading hubs, DIAC/DIFC/ADGM arbitration, sanctions/compliance, and logistics.
London: We draft English-law master agreements, LCIA/ICC strategies, TPF/ATE planning, and court-support plays.

We deliver coordinated, multi-seat strategy—not isolated local advice. Your board sees one integrated risk picture; your deal teams get one practical playbook.

17) Next Steps (Actionable)

Run a seat/law audit on your existing long-term contracts; harmonise clauses and add consolidation/joinder.
Install a price & hardship dashboard: indices, FX, carbon, and tax trackers tied to reopener triggers and notice clocks.
Stand up an evidence SOP: sampling/testing, site logs, telemetry, notice templates, and e-vaulting.

If you want, TRW can deliver this as a turn-key “Dispute-Ready Contract” programme across your portfolio in 4–6 weeks, with pilot contracts first.

Summary Table — Arbitration & Long-Term Contracts at a Glance

Topic	What to Decide	TRW Guidance (Bangladesh ⇄ Dubai ⇄ London)	Why It Matters
Governing Law	English vs. UAE/DIFC/ADGM vs. local splits	English for core commercial; local for permits/tax; clear split	Predictability + compliance
Seat & Rules	London (LCIA/ICC), DIFC/ADGM (DIAC/ADGM), Singapore (SIAC)	Pick seat for enforcement geography and remedy needs	Court support, neutrality, enforcement
Price & Reopeners	Indices, corridors, triggers, expert vs. tribunal	Basket indices; math to expert; legal scope to tribunal	Avoids stalemate; keeps performance
Hardship vs. FM	Separate triggers and remedies	Hardship = economic imbalance; FM = impediment; distinct	Stops opportunistic claims
Quality & Testing	Specs, labs, chain-of-custody, FAT/SAT	Tie-break labs, chain-of-custody, test harnesses	Evidence clarity wins cases
SLAs (Telco/Tech)	KPIs, credits, LDs, chronic breach	Credits not exclusive remedy; emergency relief enabled	Service continuity
Sanctions/ESG	Warranties, audits, snap-off termination	KYC/UBO diligence, export controls, ESG audits	Compliance + reputational defence
Consolidation/Joinder	Multi-contract disputes	Harmonise clauses; allow consolidation	Avoids fragmented proceedings
Interim Measures	Emergency arbitrator; court support	Keep court relief without waiver	Protects cash and assets
Confidentiality	Scope + carve-outs	Permit lender/regulator disclosure	Financing and compliance friendly
Title/Risk/Security	ROT or security interests; insurance	Local registrations; Incoterms alignment	Recoverability and risk clarity
Evidence SOP	What to keep and how	Logs, labs, notices, e-vault	Lowers cost, raises credibility

Contact TRW Law Firm

Tahmidur Remura Wahid (TRW) Law Firm — Global Offices
Dhaka: House 410, Road 29, Mohakhali DOHS
London: 330 High Holborn, London WC1V 7QH, United Kingdom
Dubai: Rolex Building, L-12, Sheikh Zayed Road

Call us: +8801708000660 · +8801847220062 · +8801708080817
Email: [email protected] · [email protected] · [email protected]

From drafting multi-year contracts to winning cross-border arbitrations—and, more importantly, keeping your projects running—TRW is your partner across Bangladesh, Dubai and London.

Loading…

Loading… | 5 MIN READ | BY TAHMIDUR REMURA WAHID